Nuhey News

We talk about the MARKET

‘Watershed second’: Employees win in landmark union case towards Australia’s richest airline Qantas after mass pandemic layoffs

‘Watershed moment’: Workers win in landmark union case against Australia’s richest airline Qantas after mass pandemic layoffs

In a historic win for commerce unions, Australia’s federal court docket dominated in favor of the Transport Employees Union’s case towards airline big Qantas. The outsourcing scandal noticed over 2,000 staff laid off amid the Covid pandemic.

Friday morning Justice Michael Lee mentioned he was not satisfied of the proof put forth by Qantas – Australia’s most dominating airline – that the shedding of hundreds of staff was not, no less than partly, motivated by their union membership.

Qantas dismissed greater than 2,000 floor handlers throughout the pandemic, whose roles had been outsourced to economize for the company, which in 2019 recorded AU$18 billion ($13.2 billion) in income.

The TWU employed Josh Bornstein as its head lawyer to argue the airline’s actions contravened the Truthful Work Act. The case was centered round claims that Qantas’s bullish strikes – led by CEO Alan Joyce – had been made to squash the union’s energy in wage negotiations.

“The Federal Courtroom has discovered for the primary time {that a} main employer has sacked over 2,000 employees as a result of it was looking for to deprive them of the flexibility to collectively cut price with the corporate for a brand new enterprise settlement,” mentioned Bornstein.

The union’s lawyer mentioned that Qantas had “misplaced” within the case, and highlighted that: “massive firms have used outsourcing for many years to forestall staff from with the ability to collectively cut price with them,” suggesting that Friday’s determination must be used as precedent in future employee’s rights instances.

In a tweet following Friday’s ruling, the TWU mentioned: “As we speak is a superb day – for Qantas employees, for aviation employees and for all transport employees.”

Whereas Friday’s ruling signifies that the employees who had been laid off might doubtlessly regain their jobs or obtain compensation, no particulars have been confirmed – which was strongly reiterated by Qantas the identical day.

Qantas have denied any wrongdoing and in an official assertion on Friday mentioned “As we speak’s judgment doesn’t imply Qantas is required to reinstate employees or pay compensation or penalties,” claiming that the issues haven’t but been thought of by the court docket and they’re going to oppose any such orders.

Additionally on

Australian indigenous teams, social employees slate authorities determination to deploy troops to implement lockdown in Covid-hit Sydney

“Qantas will even search to have its attraction heard as quickly as doable and earlier than any treatment listening to,” the assertion learn. The corporate justified the outsourcing by claiming it will save its homeowners and buyers AU$100 million (about $73.5 million) a yr.

As a part of their official assertion in response to Friday’s ruling, Qantas referred to as the union “hypocritical” and mentioned their habits – referring to their effort to guard employees’ rights – “undermines the robust security tradition that exists all through Australian aviation.”

©  REUTERS/Loren Elliott/File Photograph

The person behind the money-saving employees cuts, Alan Joyce, is extensively recognized for his ruthlessness on the subject of operating the airline enterprise. In an interview earlier this yr when requested about Qantas’ strategy in the direction of the pandemic, he mentioned: “It’s survival of the fittest.”

Regardless of the massive losses reported globally by most main airways, Qantas, miraculously, continued to make mammoth sums of revenue throughout the pandemic. This was largely because of authorities subsidies on 800,000 home flights.

Of their year-end monetary report for 2020, Qantas acknowledged: “Regardless of a few of the worst buying and selling situations in its historical past, the Qantas Group reported an Underlying Revenue Earlier than Tax of AU$124 million ($91 million) for FY20.”

When requested concerning the firm’s market place in Could, Joyce boasted it “is stronger than it has ever been.”

Additionally on

Ben Roberts-Smith departs the Federal Court of Australia
Regardless of the consequence of Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial, it has proved Australia’s involvement in Afghanistan was a catastrophe

Assume your pals would have an interest? Share this story!